The New Zealand government's announcement of forthcoming amendments to the Resource Management Act (RMA), aimed at reducing regulatory burdens and fostering economic development, has been met with robust opposition. The government plans to introduce the first RMA Amendment Bill next month, which includes substantial adjustments intended to support sectors such as farming and mining.
Driving the news: Government touts economic benefits
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop detailed on Tuesday the proposed changes, emphasising their necessity for economic recovery.
"This Bill will reduce the regulatory burden on resource consent applicants and support development in key sectors, including farming, mining and other primary industries. These sectors are critical to rebuilding the New Zealand economy," said Bishop.
The big picture: Opposition voices concerns
Contrasting sharply with the government's position, both the Labour and Green parties have voiced grave concerns about the proposed reforms, describing them as disastrous for environmental protection.
Green Party environment spokesperson Lan Pham condemned the reforms, stating, "This legislation will accelerate the decline of our natural world and add fuel to the climate crisis fire in what is another classic case of environmental mismanagement from this Government."
“This is an absurd dereliction of duty that will do nothing to build the infrastructure New Zealand needs, and will instead accelerate environmental decline."
Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking echoed this sentiment, criticising the government for prioritising short-term gains over sustainable development.
"These changes are being pushed through fast to avoid public scrutiny. They will water down rules that prevent our rivers from being polluted, and our native species being protected," Brooking said.
She also linked the reforms to broader legislative efforts that could exacerbate environmental damage, such as the Fast Track Approvals Bill.
“This comes at the same time the Government is pushing through the Fast Track Approvals Bill, which will give projects such as coal mines a ‘get out of jail free card’ to wreak havoc on the environment and take us further from our net-zero by 2050 goal," Brooking said.
What they're saying: A dire prediction for environmental health
Pham highlighted the potential long-term consequences of easing environmental safeguards, particularly those that protect significant natural areas and regulate pollutants.
"Halting work to protect significant natural areas will harm indigenous biodiversity, destroying the plants and animals that set Aotearoa apart from the rest of the world," she said.
Brooking further challenged the government's commitment to environmental stewardship, questioning the alignment of these reforms with New Zealand's international environmental commitments.
"Which one will the Government push through first? The one that will open the door to lobbyists and foreign mining companies? Or the one that will see our rivers more polluted? The public deserve to know the details of these changes," Brooking said.
Zoom in: The debate over priorities
The debate is set against a backdrop of increasing tension between the need for economic recovery and the imperative of environmental conservation. As the Bill progresses toward introduction in Parliament, the government must navigate significant opposition concerned with the potential irreversible damage to New Zealand’s natural landscape.
What's next: Anticipating parliamentary showdown
With RM Bill 1 expected to be introduced and debated in Parliament in May, a heated debate is anticipated. Environmental groups, along with opposition parties, are preparing to intensify their efforts to either reshape or oppose the legislation entirely.